Although the play was originally condemned as an outright attack on religion and devout people, a proper reading suggests just the opposite. Works such as Tartuffe in fact help to protect and promote religion by exposing impostors for who they really are and demonstrating the real danger they pose to society when they go unchallenged.
As Conservatives, they presumably assert from time to time generalities about the virtues of competition in free markets. So why are both signed up to policies which award long-term monopolies?
Mr McLoughlin has inherited the West Coast line problem. Richard Branson is currently seeking judicial review of the decision to award the exclusive long-distance franchise to First Group. The question we ought to be asking is not who should get this lengthy contract, but why such contracts are awarded anyway.
Mr Branson does not bid for an exclusive right for his airline to fly to New York, but has to compete for limited landing slots with other airlines. So why can we not have more than one company offering trains from London to Glasgow?
There is no technical reason.
But there could be much more such competition, with the promise of innovation and greater choice for the consumer, if both Virgin and First Group — and other possible providers — could compete via a more liberal track access policy. Failing a more thorough privatisation of the rail network, surely this is worth trying?
Clearly Mr Gove has been hoodwinked by his civil servants into believing the story that competition between exam boards has driven down standards, when the reason for this decline is the persistent interference of governments and a regulatory system that forced boards to set grade boundaries within narrow statistical tolerances determined by teacher predictions, student intake and other highly debatable indicators which gradually drift upwards over time.
Before governments started intervening so closely in schools examinations back in the s, competition between boards was uncontentious and often highly creative, leading to innovative syllabuses and new methods of assessment things like Nuffield Science, for example.
We ought to be seeking similar types of external assessment, rather than relying, as with the railways, on yet tighter regulation of monopoly suppliers. His research interests are primarily in the economics of labour markets. He has worked with many think tanks, most closely with the Institute of Economic Affairs, where he is an Economics Fellow.
Does anyone think that this is desirable? Should everybody learn exactly the same things? Should there not be considerable, and competing, variations in what people consider the most relevant aspects of a particular subject?
The example he gave of Nuffield science courses is a good one. The Nuffield syllabuses were, in my opinion, a big improvement over what went before, but they would never have had the opportunity to establish themselves under the system Gove proposes.
It is true that in competition consumers the schools will choose the exam boards that will benefit them most, however, the benefit exam boards can provide to them is a large percentage of top class grades. Other boards then seek to win the affections of schools by offering, in turn, lower grade boundaries and so on… It is a perfect example of misplaced market actions.
A standardized exam board would ensure grade boundaries remain constant. For some years I was chairman of the Cambridge Business Studies Project Trust; and my experience was that competing exam boards in Business Studies worked perfectly well.
That was competition in action — and it succeeded for years. If what you say is true then the following questions have to be answered: The answer, probably, is twofold.
One aspect is that league tables based on crude data which served an important purpose it has to be admitted led to the numbers of top grades an exam board produced becoming more important than the reputation of the exam board for good examining. The second is the endless quest for comparability between vocational and academic subjects that has led academic content to be needlessly injected into the former and withdrawn from the latter.
A third aspect is possibly the move away from exam boards that developed spontaneously amongst centres of society who were end-users of the qualification universities, business professions, city and guilds towards a small number of commercialised exam boards with less connection with those groups — this was something strongly encouraged by government.
But, you raise a good point — and unscrambling eggs is not easy!Literary Devices in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight Symbolism, Imagery, Allegory The narrator of Sir Gawain is very clear about what the pentangle (five-pointed star) on Gawain’s shield represents: It is a symbol that Solomon designed long ago As an emblem of fidelity, and ju.
[tags: literary analysis] Research Papers words ( pages) Essay on A Thousand Splendid Suns by Hosseini A Hosseini - The relationship between Laila, Mariam, and Rasheed in Hosseini’s novel, A Thousand Splendid Suns, characterizes powerful motifs that are visible through an analytical standpoint.
Themes such as women’s rights and.
Start studying Chapter Antitrust Law - Monopolies and Mergers. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Start studying antitrust law - monopolies and mergers. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. a rather straightforward framework for monopoly analysis has emerged: some of the potential virtues of mergers include.
Oct 08, · 5 responses to Peter Thiel on the Virtues of Monopoly Tracey G. 10 October at am competition is create advance in technology and that is a fact, monopoly create competition and we have to understand the synergy. Buy a cheap copy of Trust: The Social Virtues and the book by Francis Fukuyama.
In his bestselling The End of History and the Last Man, Francis Fukuyama argued that the end of the Cold War would also mean the beginning of a struggle for Free shipping over $